No reason to con ine itsel to the hexagon

Tomorrow morning, annual ritual. Candidates to the tray, all combined series, go loor on the subjects o philo. It is a day where, between the dollar and international tensions, titles are a little place strange issues, essential and insoluble. At irst, is belie ed to grasp their meaning and their scope, in the second, it includes be building them, turn them into a problem. The time o a lash, it sees queries that the pace o news does not treat. This is still a curious rench custom. Why not make a game

It would be to take a ew questions ha e allen in recent years to pro ide, in a custom way, to those who are best placed, or the more embarrassed to think. or example, rançois Chérèque, Bernard Thibault and all those who ha e pension record, it would gladly meditate on the subject o IBC: "de end its rights, is that the same thing that de end its interests." Would although Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Cécile Du lot and green write a copy on "project mastering nature is reasonable." or Claude Allègre, as this is a tailor-made: "respect the nature, is - this gi e to the trans orm.

No reason to con ine itsel to the hexagon. Ste e Jobs and Bill Gates should get or talking to: "May it be sla e o a technical object", Da id Cameron échinerait on "Should we all expect rom the State", and it wouldchoice, Nelson Mandela or the commémorateurs o June 18, 1940 to treat " reedom is de ined as a power to re use." It would lea e the current leaders o the rance, less than pressed other Europeans to implement a policy o austerity, the care to ponder the question: "Should be pre erred happiness to the truth"

O icials o commissions o inquiry, will be "why should a act be established Since it is a act, it is ound, there is not to build it. Since it is disputed, uncertain in its details, it should be instead cross-checking in ormation, examine the e idence. The anarchists, could book one: "the idea o total reedom ha e a meaning", and warn them o the danger: i reedom is total, each will decide the meaning... Might also be appropriate to the enemies o the State: "is this Act to determine my happiness." But may pre er to reser e this subject to addicts, homoparentaux couples... who else yet

Because it may play in the other direction, rom a subject and seek the best recipient. This is not always clear. "That won in Exchange", is an essay or oreign currency trader or partner swapping Should we submit this di icult exercise: "does the question"who am I"admits an exact answer" a mathematician or a patient su ering rom multiple personalities Other times, on the contrary, there is only the embarrassment o the choice. Collectors list is ery long, which can make "can be like a work o art without understanding." And it can reward the lawyers, police, betrayed lo ers and ans o logic o the enigmatic "A what are the e idence".

The basic rule is that the subjects are authentic, documented in the annals, and that they are deli ered to actual igures. It there ore de iate principle parody subjects (o the type "Can it bite teeth") and candidates o pure iction, as this rench academician highlighting head to mo e the tray against the unanimous ad ice o his peers... he exists only in "The gap", a piece o 1964 by Eugène Ionesco. I all o this has the air o a joke, don't there rely. There ore o er to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, or any another dictator in di iculty, this subject to meditate: "what truth is she capable". You will see that it is serious.